Sunday, August 31, 2008
Sarah Palin: What's Being Left Unsaid
As with all of those who think of themselves in some way or another on the right, i.e., against the left, I had a surprisingly, pleasant reaction when hearing Sarah Palin was picked as McCain's running. Having watched her in interviews on news programs on several occasions, I knew that on a number of levels she is better than most politicians today.
That she accepted the invitation to be McCain's V.P. and that everyone from the crazy Libertarians to our most whacked-out Bible-thumping evangelists love this woman, makes it obvious that she is not as good as I hoped. I love that she is a confident, intelligent, strong-willed, but still a feminine woman who loves sports, guns, apple pie, and America. Her stances on the environment and teaching creationism in schools are not reassuring, but the thing that I find most distressing about her is that in the 21st century, with the technology required to safely perform abortions, especially in first trimester, that an intelligent, competent, woman who loves her life and is strong enough to stand up against the rest of world on a number of issues -- a female maverick as the are saying -- armed with the knowledge that she was carrying a baby with Down's Syndrome would choose not to have an abortion.
I think that everyone -- including those who are mentally disabled, but still able to function at some basic level in human society -- has a right to their bodies, actions, and choices. If a woman chooses to "keep her baby" that is her right to do so; but, the only reason I can think for doing such a terrible thing is to choose to bear some terrible duty -- to make your life about suffering; to choose to tie yourself (and society) to supporting this child for 40-50 years. Whatever joys that one receives form a child (normal or handicapped), they are far outweighed and inconsequential when compared to the suffering that a severely mentally handicapped child brings.
The work, suffering, and mental anguish that a healthy child brings is outweighed for the most part by the joys of watching and guiding him to adulthood. Without these joys and experiences, there is no reward or justification for late nights, constant hospital visits, stress, worrying, bills, diaper changes, the loss of personal privacy, and the freedom to do other things you truly love.
I am not a fan of statistics, but that approximately 80 to 90% of Down Syndrome fetuses are aborted is very telling. In any situation, controversial or not, that you see the numbers skewed more than 70-30; you are looking at a virtual consensus. I have read a number of articles this morning talking about the lives and accomplishments that people with mild form of Down's Syndrome can lead. And that's great. I take nothing away from those people. I wish them all the best. Where I think the evil lies is in those 10 to 20% of parents who think that God had deemed them worthy or better than the rest of world; that they are somehow stronger and more capable and thus must be willing to bear the blessing of suffering through life with a child with Down's Syndrome.
It is wrong to force that kind of suffering on the child, it is wrong to force that child into a society where it can never truly be a part, and it is wrong to force oneself to bear unhappiness and suffering as a constant, important, part of one's life. That Sarah Palin would make this choice brings her judgment and motives into question; that in other areas she is still head and shoulders above McCain, Obama and Biden is a testament to how bad things are right now, both in the culture and in politics.
I also recommend Myrhaf's commentary on Saran Palin:
Sara Palin
More Thoughts On Sarah Palin
Ammendum 9/1/2008:
Mike's Eyes (Spotted By) has a well-written piece on Govenor Palin:
Palin for GOP VP
And to create a virtuous circle, I would like to point you to Rational Passion's post on Palin, which quotes a good portion of my post (note to self, add a copyright stamement!). For the record a good portion of my thinking on Palin, Down's Syndrome, and abortion was helped by a number of conversations with Rational Passion:
Thoughts On The Palin Pick
In addition, in the comment section of Rassional Passion's post there is an interesting exchange on Down's syndrome. I still have some good thinking to do on this subject, but I can say definitively that it is my position that no matter how nice of a life that a person with Down's Syndrome could potentially have, one cannot know this while the potential is still a fetus. And even if one could, it would be better to abort and try again, or to abort and adopt than to place that burdern on yourself.
Life is about achieving success and joy, not burdens and suffering.
I have much to say and explain on this subject, so I have decided to start a new blog, the depth that I want to write on this subject is not appropriate for The Aesthetic Capitalist. The new blog is End Down's Syndrome, I will add the link here as soon as I fnish the first my post.
Ammendum 9/3/2008:
I have started a new blog, devoted to interesting philosophical, psychological, and poltical issues related to Down Syndrome, mental retardation, and mental birth defects: End Down Syndrome
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
I want to agree with you for the most part, it's just, I think for some people, that stuff just doesn't matter. Somehow, for them, a child is a child, and they love them regardless, to the point that all that other stuff doesn't matter.
That said, I can't imagine what is going through their heads if they know their child will be born with Down's Syndrome, and they have a choice.
I'm reminded of a play I saw a while back, about Genetic Screening (yes, it was as polemic as it sounds) and the conclusion was that children would hate their parents for being so selective, and not being willing to love their children regardless.
I think, looking back, that I would be pissed off if my parents had the choice to make me better, and it was no financial obstacle to them, but they just chose not to.
Can you imagine how worthless that would make you feel, that your parents thought you didn't deserve to have the best?
I mean jesus, if I had Down's Syndrome, and I discovered my parents brought me into this world, knowing what it would do to me, I would be absolutely furious.
Rory,
I absolutely agree. A lot of people aren't going to care about what I wrote, but thankfully I don't write for them.
The facts are the facts. If my child's brain, the very thing that makes him human (allows him to grow, learn, explore and succeed; the thing that makes him able to love and be loved) is compromised before he is born, I can see no rational case to make that the damaged fetus is a cross that I must bare for the rest of my life. And the fact that someone would choose that life for both themselves and for their child is monstrous.
That said, I do agree on the positive angle you wrote about. Having received my college degree in genetics and biotechnology, I too find the subject of genetic screening and genetic improvement quite fascinating. Why is it that people and can see the value of improving their lives -- school, exercise, medicine, orthodontics, etc -- after their child is born, but somehow adding some chemicals and/or genetic material to the mix prior to birth is wrong?
When the technology is to the point where doctors can give children stronger immune systems, clear skin, larger and faster brains, better eye sight, I will be championing it.
Whereas previously, a Down’s child could be born without the prior knowledge of the mother, going forward, a parent with a Down’s child will likely (at least in the developed world) have made a conscious choice to have that child. As prenatal testing for trisomy 21 becomes ubiquitous, Down’s children (and eventually those with other genetic disorders) will increasingly become symbols of faith – a freak show meant to communicate the “family values” of their parents. The children will become public sacrifices made by their parents for their faith. They will be a symbol of religious reverence in the same way as the scarred backs of Catholics who flagellate themselves, or Buddhist monks who set themselves on fire, or Sunni Muslims who mutilate their girl’s genitals or Shiites who bloody their children’s heads with swords.
Thank you HeroicLife for your comment.
While poking around your site, I came across several items I want to share with my readers:
Pro-down syndrome: a moral atrocity
Follow up on my Down syndrome post
Christian fundamentalists put freaks on parade
Post a Comment